“Rebel Moon — Part Two: The Scargiver” stars Sofia Boutella, Djimon Hounsou, Ed Skrein, Michiel Huisman, Doona Bae, Ray Fisher, Staz Nair, Fra Fee, Elise Duffy, and Anthony Hopkins. Released on Netflix on April 19, 2024, the film has Kora and her crew defending their home from the Motherworld. The film was directed by Zack Snyder, who also directed films such as “300”, “Watchmen”, “Man of Steel”, and “Army of the Dead”. It is the second part of Snyder’s “Rebel Moon” two-part saga. It wasn’t that long ago when visual maestro Zack Snyder introduced us to his own take on “Star Wars” on Netflix, hoping to establish a new IP franchise for the streaming service. While it provided exactly what we expected from its presentation and visuals, the first part of the space opera saga didn’t land with critics and audiences regarding its familiar story beats and characters. It didn’t even come close to reaching the level of hype and quality as the iconic sci-fi franchise that inspired the film. However, that didn’t stop Snyder from continuing the story of Kora and her battle against the Motherworld. It doesn’t excuse the filmmaker for making us wait for his extended cuts to see how much good material was cut out, but again, there’s no winning in Snyder’s universe. With that said, let’s return to this galactic universe and see if the second part could steer this ship in the right direction. The movie picks up where “A Child of Fire” left off. The former Imperium soldier turned rebel Kora (Boutella) and her surviving warriors returned home to Veldt after their victory over the Imperium admiral Atticus Noble (Skrein). However, their celebration is short-lived when they find that Atticus has been revived by the Imperium, who now seeks revenge against Kora. With the dreadnought ship arriving in Veldt in five days, Kora and her team must train the entire village to defend and fight for their home before the Motherworld bombs it out of orbit. As their latest fight approaches, more secrets slowly come to light, mainly Kora and her past as an Imperium soldier. You know that feeling when even though your interest in a franchise waned after watching an installment, you still want to see what happens next based on its cliffhanger ending? That’s my feeling toward Zack Snyder’s “Rebel Moon”. For those who haven’t read my review of “A Child of Fire”, I thought the film was simply okay. From a visual perspective, it’s a remarkably stylish portrait of a corrupted galaxy packed with gorgeous set pieces and impressive CGI. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for its narrative, a derivative and incomplete galactic journey devoid of memorable characters and emotional depth. Because of this, I became one of the people who weren’t as excited about “The Scargiver” as we were for the upcoming summer blockbusters. Despite that, I watched it anyway because I was fascinated with the world Snyder introduced in “A Child of Fire” and the director’s stylistic vision. So, how does this epic battle compare to the first chapter of Snyder's space opera? Honestly, it's pretty inferior to what we were introduced months ago. Like its predecessor, “The Scargiver” delivered what we expected from its concept: Zack Snyder’s version of “Star Wars”. Unfortunately, it also provided the same issues that plagued the galactic odyssey, including its cliche-filled plot and mundane characters. While it slightly improved some character moments via flashbacks, the movie struggled to inject genuine emotion into its stakes, action, and dynamics. It also didn’t help that the movie felt more contained with its world-building than “A Child of Fire”, with most of the plot and action taking place on Veldt. With “A Child of Fire” being a galactic road trip across the universe, “The Scargiver” is a fantasy war film set on one planet that’s akin to “The Return of the King”, but without the satisfaction and tension of its scope and grandeur artistry. I somehow enjoyed its predecessor a bit more because of the planets it introduced and their inhabitants, which were done exceptionally well through the movie’s visual effects and production designs. One example is the moon of Veldt, which is surrounded by the vastly gorgeous landscapes around its village. While this location still looked stunning in “The Scargiver”, its appeal sadly didn’t last very long due to this limitation. Sure, they showed some parts of the different planets in flashbacks, but neither captured the same interest as the ones from “A Child of Fire”. As a result, “The Scargiver” is another unfortunate example of style over substance that attempted to copy the other cinematic epics like “Star Wars” without knowing why they worked in the first place. However, I will give the movie this: it retains the visually pleasing atmosphere that Snyder has been known for. Similar to Snyder's other works, "The Scargiver" is a stunning visual feast that is surrounded by slow-motion sequences and artistic shots that are worthy of being displayed in a museum. Although it doesn't quite measure up to Snyder's previous films, its presentation still managed to captivate me more than the characters it portrays. I would also point out that the CGI still looked stellar for its seamless interactions with the environments, mainly for the props, action scenes, and Jimmy (voiced by Anthony Hopkins). This, along with its final battle sequence, is enough to admire the cinematic craftsmanship that Snyder has delivered for years, for better or worse. It’s too bad that the immersion in this world is still overshadowed by its inferior narrative. Much of the cast reprised their roles from its predecessor, including Boutella as Kora and Skrein as Atticus Noble. As usual, their performances ranged from okay to “could’ve been better”. There were a few moments where the actors tried to inject a soul into their performances, but there were also some instances where their acting was almost as dull as the characters they were portraying. Djimon Hounsou and Anthony Hopkins were the only good actors in the film due to their performances as Titus and Jimmy, respectively. Doona Bae also provided another decent moment as Nemesis regarding her small bond with one of the village children. Also, her skills with the laser sword were enough to salvage the film’s mediocrity. It's a shame she wasn’t born in the Star Wars universe. Overall, “Rebel Moon — Part Two: The Scargiver” is another intergalactic slog whose stunning presentation struggled to heal most of its cinematic scars. Regarding the gritty visuals, action, and darkly-colored environments, Zack Snyder can do no wrong in providing galactic eye candy to his fans. However, it also further showcases the director’s frustrating attempts at matching them with an immersive story and exciting characters. Some of its character moments were slightly improved in “The Scargiver”, but the satisfaction of those scenes winds up being equivalent to space itself: vastly empty and dull. With its so-so cast, subpar direction and script, underwhelming characters, and weak emotion, the film is a disappointing continuation of Snyder’s space opera saga that’s more upsetting than promising. If Snyder and the crew are actually planning on making more “Rebel Moon” installments, then they should really start taking those criticisms to heart and consider releasing their original cuts instead of the heavily edited ones. Man, the R-rated cuts of “Rebel Moon” couldn’t come fast enough… D+
0 Comments
“Challengers” stars Zendaya, Josh O’Connor, Mike Faist, Darnell Appling, AJ Lister, Nada Despotovich, Naheem Garcia, Hailey Gates, and Jake Jensen. Released on April 26, 2024, the film has the wife of a tennis champion competing against her former lover. The film was directed by Luca Guadagnino, who also directed films such as “The Protagonists”, “I Am Love”, “Call Me by Your Name”, and “Bones and All”. When you’re a professional sports player, you always have to find ways to stay on top of your game. These struggles usually happen on the court, but on some occasions, the biggest ones can occur outside of it, especially on a personal level. The last weekend of April hopes to get the summer party train going early with a couple of selections eager to get adults back into the cinema. One of these is the latest sports drama that shows that events outside the court can be just as intense as the sport itself. Tennis could be seen as a boring sport where two players hit the ball back and forth for minutes, but the power of film usually strives to make it more exciting, with this film by acclaimed director Luca Guadagnino seeking to be another example. Was it able to score some aces in the quality department? Let’s find out. The story follows Tashi Duncan (Zendaya), a tennis prodigy dominating the court through her skills. During a tournament, Tashi meets and seduces two other tennis players: Art Donaldson (Faist) and his best friend Patrick Zweig (O’Connor). After a career-ending injury that forced her to retire, Tashi marries Art, now on a losing streak. As Art’s wife and coach, Tashi attempts to help her husband redeem his status by participating in a Challenger tournament in New York. However, her strategy takes a surprising turn when they encounter Patrick at the event, pitting the two former friends against each other. Tennis isn’t usually my cup of tea, but it has maintained my interest thanks to the movies surrounding it, including “King Richard”. Of course, that’s not the only reason I looked forward to “Challengers”. One of those reasons is Zendaya, who continues to dominate the industry with her star-powered roles, including the “Dune” adaptations. Her presence usually prevails in making her movies watchable, and based on the early reviews it’s getting, the film is succeeding in maintaining her booming trend. The other is Luca Guadagnino, the director behind the movie. While I admired his unique vision, the only film I watched from Guadagnino was 2017’s “Call Me by Your Name”, which I thought was good enough to keep a close eye on his career. I also planned on seeing his previous film, “Bones and All”, but my scheduling kept me from doing so. Maybe someday I’ll check it out. So, this makes “Challengers” my second exposure to Guadagnino’s directorial vision, which promises sexual desire and drama amid the sports action. With “Call Me By Your Name” being a warm-up to my experience with Guadagnino’s vision, “Challengers” has the filmmaker go all in with a combination of sports action and romance drama and expressing the kinetic tension of both aspects. The result is a near-perfect depiction of an unhealthy romance driven by the sport that also serves as an acting tour de force for the main leads. While the direction may depend on people’s expectations from the posters and marketing, the movie has plenty to offer, ranging from its steamy sex to the engaging tennis matches, both of which serve a story’s purpose instead of being excuses for its two-hour-plus runtime. For the sex scenes, it’s easy to argue its necessity to slow a film down to showcase characters making love for all you naughty folks. Some cases prove their importance and others…well, they’re just there to grab people’s attention. “Challengers” is an example of the former, in which they drive a complex love triangle affecting the characters’ mentality in their tennis careers and friendship through its nonlinear narrative. Having a story depicted in nonlinear flashbacks helps the film maintain the consistency of the drama between the three tennis players and its pacing. The movie's primary focus is the final match between Art and Patrick, but it also depicts how they got to this position through flashbacks from their college days to the 2019 Challenger event in New Rochelle. Through Guadagnino’s vision and Justin Kuritzkes’s screenplay, “Challengers” provides a captivating and stylishly grounded outlook of a romantic relationship turned sour and a desire to be on top, affecting the friendship between Art and Patrick and their careers. Some people may point out that it’s another scenario where those desires get physical or worse. However, that isn’t the case. Writer Justin Kuritzkes bypassed those traditional elements in favor of a realistic and dramatic approach to the topics. It might not be as exciting as the other romance thrillers it’s seemingly copying, but the film compensates with a gripping and often refreshing narrative that refuses to throw in the towel. As for Guadagnino, I was impressed with his approach to its storytelling and technical aspects. The cinematography from Sayombhu Mukdeeprom was a brilliant display of immersion and visual finesse, and the editing was packed with energy without being an eyesore. The director also had a specific balance of suspense and drama that was neither overpowering nor dull. He keeps the melodrama at a minimum while ensuring the down-to-earth conversations and emotions remain interesting. It’s pretty challenging to accomplish without putting the audience to sleep, but Guadagnino found a way to make it work, and I must say, it was a satisfying treat to endure. Another example I’d point out is the score by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, who previously worked with Guadagnino on “Bones and All”. Reznor and Ross have crafted another fascinating piece of cinematic music that heightens the drama and tennis sequences through its techno-esque tunes. While there are a couple of moments where the score was unwarranted, it’s still a splendid piece to listen to if you’re in the mood to get yourself excited for a sporting event. As mentioned earlier, “Challengers” is a spectacular display of the talent involved, with the three main leads being the driving force of the experience. With this film and “Dune Part Two”, I will be the next person to say this might be another successful year for Zendaya. Her portrayal of Tashi has the actress volleying between feistiness and intricacy throughout her performance, with neither one fumbling once throughout its runtime. It’s uncertain whether it’s my favorite performance from Zendaya, but I will say that she remains on top of her acting game regarding her filmography. Josh O’Connor was also great as Patrick, a former friend willing to turn his tennis career around, similar to Art. I would also credit Mike Faist for keeping his career alive following his first major role in Steven Spielberg’s “West Side Story”, thanks to his magnetic portrayal of Art. It would be interesting to see if he’ll keep the streak going with the upcoming “Bikeriders”. Overall, “Challengers” is a near-perfect match that volleys between captivating romance and thrilling sports action with style and momentum. It might not please everyone with its approach to the narrative. However, it’s still a well-made and cleverly engrossing sports movie that shows that even the intense matches lie beyond the court. The main leads were terrific in their roles, Guadagnino provided a stylistic flair to the drama and tennis sequences, and the screenplay succeeded in balancing its conventional beats with complexity and realism. I also really enjoyed Reznor and Ross’s score, even though some scenes could’ve been better without it. It’s far from my favorite film of the year, but it’s another cinematic piece that made me rethink my perspective on tennis. A-“Boy Kills World” stars Bill Skarsgård, Jessica Rothe, Michelle Dockery, Famke Janssen, Sharlto Copley, Brett Gelman, Isaiah Mustafa, Andrew Koji, Yayan Ruhian, and H. Jon Benjamin. Releasing on April 26, 2024, the film has a deaf man enacting vengeance on the people who murdered his family. The film features the feature directorial debut of Moritz Mohr, who directed the short films “Akumi”, “Vidiots”, and “Hurensohn”. Mohr also directed the 2011 television series “Viva Berlin!”. It is based on a short film by Mohr and Armend Remmers. There’s no denying that if you take away those someone holds dear to their hearts, you better be prepared to face the consequences. If that someone happens to be a silent man with his inner voice sounding like Bob Belcher, you should also be ready to lose a lot of blood. Many revenge-driven movies have taught us this for years, and thanks to this latest action thriller from producer Sam Raimi, it surely won’t be the last. This film sees Raimi bringing the ultra-violent short film from Mohr and Remmers to the big screen, which promises plenty of jaw-dropping action, pulpy stylish flairs, and remarkably entertaining stunt work, more so than Dev Patel’s “Monkey Man”. Was it fun and bloody enough to exact its vengeance? Let’s find out. The story follows Boy (Skarsgård), a young man whose family was brutally murdered by Hilda van der Koy (Janssen), the monarch of a corrupted royal family ruling over a post-apocalyptic world. The attack resulted in Boy being deaf and mute, with his thoughts now being expressed by his inner voice (Benjamin) derived from his childhood video game. After learning martial arts from a mysterious shaman (Ruhian), Boy sets out on a blood-soaked journey to seek revenge against the entire Koy family. With the help of a resistance team consisting of Benny (Mustafa) and Basho (Koji), Boy must survive every dangerous obstacle, including a televised execution called “The Culling”, to complete his mission and free himself from the pains of his past. While my intrigue was set on Zendaya playing tennis, “Boy Kills World” was actually something I was looking forward to the most this weekend. Obviously, it’s because I couldn’t get enough of action movies, especially ones that are original, and the cast is quite stacked with some familiar names, including Bill Skarsgård. But more importantly, the concept behind it looked pretty darn bonkers. Yes, it’s another revenge movie we’ve seen many times before, but the way it’s reflected regarding its kinetic presentation and post-apocalyptic setting is enough to get me ecstatic about it. Fortunately, I didn’t have to wait until this weekend to see if it lives up to its potential. I attended a mystery movie event at my favorite cinema, which happens to be “Boy Kills World”, much to my delight. It would be even better if it were “Furiosa”. Hopefully, they're saving that as next month's mystery movie. Until I know for sure, I want to talk about the boy who murdered the corrupted world. “Boy Kills World” is more along the lines of “Kill Bill” on drugs than an R-rated sequel to “Boy Meets World”. The movie depicts the unnamed man infiltrating an empire and beating the crud out of people responsible for murdering his family, all while bickering with the spirit of his younger sister, Mina (Quinn Copeland). Did I mention that he was also deaf and mute? Yeah, that’s how crazy this film seemed. It delivers exactly what the premise promised, so if you expect it to surprise you with its themes and world-building, you might be disappointed by the outcome. However, if you only need a simple escape from reality, you'll easily have a great time with this high-octane, action-packed ride. Loaded with stylized energy and pulpy action, "Boy Kills World" is a refreshing and kinetic take on the revenge action formula that hits the mark with its tone. With Moritz Mohr’s experience being from the short film of the same name, he was tasked with expanding his concept into a 110-minute-long roller coaster consisting of brutalities, energetic flairs, and Bob Belcher providing color commentary. While Arend Remmers co-wrote the screenplay with Tyler Burton Smith, Mohr takes control as a solo director. Filmmakers who return to expand their short films can often succeed in honoring the source material they created. However, it also comes with the challenge of capturing the interest of those unfamiliar with their works. Based on what I’ve seen, I thought Mohr handled this challenge very well, especially regarding his vision. Its presentation exuded an intense and surreal vibe that transcended beyond its visuals. It imbued its sceneries and action sequences with a sense of frenetic energy that captivated me thoroughly. The editing and cinematography further enhanced this hallucinatory feel, resulting in an experience that was nothing short of mesmerizing. It’s as if Mohr puts John Wick, graphic novels, and video game influences into a blender and mixes them to create a blood-soaked smoothie with a lime on top of it. It should’ve tasted foul based on the description alone, but instead, it wound up being a sublime treat full of flavor and radiant pizazz. What makes it even better is how the movie balances the thriller aspect with its corny comedy vibes, mainly from Boy’s chemistry with the supporting characters like Mina. The film succeeds in providing slickness and guts to its insane yet well-choreographed action scenes, but its main success was not taking itself too seriously. Sure, the story doesn’t delve deep into its themes amid its formula, although the third act’s twist did save it from being too derivative. Nevertheless, it more than compensates with its delightful gags that seem parodic and charismatic characters powered by its impeccable cast. Despite Boy’s lack of speech, Bill Skarsgård is another actor who proves you don’t need words to put on an astounding show through your performance. His range of emotions was effectively portrayed by Skarsgård, even when his inner voice does the talking. By the way, H. Jon Benjamin, known for voicing Bob Belcher in “Bob’s Burgers”, was a perfect fit for Boy’s inner voice, and you can’t make me change my mind. Jessica Rothe and Brett Gelman were also decent as June 27 and Gideon van der Koy, respectively, which makes me glad they’re continuing to find work outside their well-known properties. Sharlto Copley also appeared as Glen van der Koy and was just as entertaining as usual. It’s pretty funny that Copley has started and ended the month of April with an action movie. The stars have perfectly aligned for the actor. Overall, “Boy Kills World” is a gloriously entertaining and delightfully bonkers roller coaster that favors murderous style over substance in the best way possible. It may not impress everyone looking for deep real-world themes amid its chaotic bloodshed and familiar narrative beats. However, the film shows that a satisfying execution of a bizarre idea and the will to just have fun with it are the things needed to make astounding popcorn entertainment. Bill Skarsgård leads an entertaining cast with his non-verbal performance, and Moritz Mohr’s direction effectively enraptures its balance of gory action and pulpy, stylized comedy. It’s the most fun I had from an action movie this year, and it’s definitely worth your time if you enjoy bizarre films like this. B+“Abigail” stars Melissa Barrera, Dan Stevens, Alisha Weir, Kathryn Newton, Will Catlett, Kevin Durand, Angus Cloud, and Giancarlo Esposito. Released on April 19, 2024, the film has a group of kidnappers discovering a young girl’s deadly secret. The film was directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett (Radio Silence), who also directed films such as “Devil’s Due”, “Ready or Not”, and “Scream VI”. It is loosely inspired by the 1936 film “Dracula’s Daughter”. They say that children can be quite monsters because of their unruly behavior. But for this unique child, “monster” isn’t enough to describe her abnormality. It’s too bad the poor souls who dare to kidnap this ballet-loving girl didn’t think of that before it’s too late. Don’t you love it when kidnappers get a lovely dose of karma? This weekend brings us yet another R-rated horror film seeking to satisfy audiences with its blood-soaked carnage and monstrous chaos. This time, we have a loosely unique take on the classic tale of Dracula, in which a young girl takes on the role of a vampire feasting upon its prey. Man, Universal’s Classic Monsters Universe is really starting to go in different directions. It’s also the latest feature from the surprisingly talented Radio Silence, who’s looking to extend their winning streak in horror after they departed from the “Scream” franchise. Does the film have enough bite in its concept to deliver another frighteningly fun experience? Let’s find out. The story centers on a group of criminals formed by their informant Lambert (Esposito). The group consists of recovering drug addict Joey (Barrera), former detective Frank (Stevens), hacker Sammy (Newton), sociopathic driver Dean (Cloud), Marine sniper Rickles (Catlett), and mob enforcer Peter (Durand). Lambert tasked the team to kidnap a young ballet dancer named Abigail (Weir), who’s also the daughter of a powerful underworld figure, and bring her to a secluded mansion. There, they’re assigned to ensure Abigail’s safety for 24 hours to receive a $7 million check for each member. Unfortunately, they eventually discover that their “simple” assignment is easier said than done when they find that their seemingly innocent target is actually a vampire. This discovery forces Joey and the others to survive Abigail’s deadly wrath before they become her all-you-can-eat buffet. Movies involving vampires or any other classic monster can be hit and miss depending on the execution, especially Universal’s recent attempt to revive its iconic monsters like Dracula and the Mummy. However, “Abigail” looked like it could be something unique based on its marketing. Along with a concept that takes an intriguing spin on the classic monster movie formula, the film also features the latest collaboration between Radio Silence and Melissa Barrera following their recent “Scream” sequels. While it’s still a shame they won’t be back for the seventh installment due to circumstances, I was happy that they’re able to find more projects to work on together, especially “Abigail”. So far, the Radio Silence directors have been dominating the industry regarding their takes on the horror genre, which is still an impressive accomplishment considering their first solo feature was “Devil’s Due”. Much to my satisfaction, “Abigail” manages to keep their booming trend going with another bonkers roller coaster that’s bloody, humorous, and fun. Does it reinvent the horror formula in any shape or form? Not exactly. It’s a straightforward and mildly predictable story about a group of people getting more than they bargained for, leaving them to fight or flee from a vampiric ballerina. It offers what you expect from a movie like this, plus a few exploding bodies and brutal moments that’ll make you squirm, laugh, or even both. Yes, I did say “laugh”. While it is described as a horror thriller, “Abigail” has plenty of humor sprinkling around its dialogue and violence to ensure it doesn’t take itself too seriously, which I think is for the better. What I enjoyed the most from Matt and Tyler’s direction is that they find specific ways to balance the comedy with the horror elements without making the former forced or awkward. Not every horror movie needs to be all dark and gloomy. They let this mixture prance around gracefully like a ballerina, resulting in genuine amusement amid its scares.…or lack thereof. This direction helped the recent “Scream” sequels honor the meta-slasher franchise Wes Craven created, which still bums me out that they’re not returning to direct “Scream 7”. But I am happy that it also helped “Abigail” dance around its familiarity to provide a blood-soaking good time at the movies. Matt and Tyler also did a stellar job delivering atmospheric terror through the film's lighting and cinematography. However, the film may disappoint those seeking intense scares as it is light on them. Nevertheless, the technical aspects and visuals of the movie are enough to capture the fear of being trapped in a mysterious mansion with a vampire girl. This showcases Matt and Tyler’s expertise in the horror genre, not only in their vision but also in their ability to make scary movies enjoyable again. The screenplay by Stephen Shields and Guy Busick may not be groundbreaking regarding its formulaic traits and hit-and-miss twists, but it compensates with the surprising amount of effort it puts into its execution and characters. The gang of criminals is practically despicable, but that doesn’t make them unlikable from a narrative perspective. Each of them has a different kind of charisma and soul in their personalities, making them stand out from the other one-dimensional horror victims, even though the emotional depth is more sour than sweet. The primary example of this is Joey, whose drug addiction separated her from her son, which is all I can say about her without spoiling anything else. This is due to its invigorating cast, who all did very well in elevating the film’s terror and humor, especially Melissa Barrera, who remains a captivating presence in the film industry regarding her engaging performance as Joey. Dan Stevens was also a treat to witness as the snarky Frank, continuing his successful year following his appearance in “Godzilla x Kong”. Kathryn Newton was fine as Sammy despite her delivery being periodically bland, and Angus Cloud made a suitable final appearance as Dean before his tragic death last year. However, the two actors who stole most of the show were Alisha Weir and Kevin Durand. Weir, best known for portraying Matilda Wormwood in Netflix’s “Matilda the Musical”, was tasked to deliver a delightfully creepy vampire with a thirst for blood and ballet. The result is a remarkable turning point for the young actress that’s both charming and disturbing. I thought Weir did very well in “Matilda the Musical”, but her role in “Abigail” could be the one to put her on the Hollywood map. I also didn’t expect to enjoy Kevin Durand as Peter that much until I watched him myself. Peter's gullible yet sincere personality should’ve wrecked the movie’s tone, but instead, it adds more amusement to the characters’ chemistry. It’s enough to make me interested in Durand’s next film, in which he plays a tyrannical ape. I’ll let you guess what that movie is. Overall, “Abigail” has enough blood in its narrative veins to provide a delightfully gory and humorous ballet flourishing with style and talent. Regarding the formulaic elements in its screenplay and hit-and-miss twists, this is far from Radio Silence’s best work, with the crown still belonging to “Ready or Not”. However, I still enjoyed watching the vampiric girl play with her food. It’s simplistic to a fault, but the efforts in making the cruel characters likable and the concept entertaining and bloody are able to pirouette over its familiarity with ease. Thanks to its diverting cast, direction, tolerable characters, and atmospheric presentation, the film is another bonafide horror hit worth sinking your teeth into. If you’re a fan of Radio Silence’s other works, this film is worth checking out. B“The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare” stars Henry Cavill, Eiza González, Alan Ritchson, Alex Pettyfer, Hero Fiennes Tiffin, Babs Olusanmokun, Henrique Zaga, Til Schweiger, Henry Golding, and Cary Elwes. Releasing on April 19, 2024, the film depicts the Special Operations Executive and their war against the Nazis during World War II. The film is directed by Guy Ritchie, who also directed films such as “Snatch”, “Sherlock Holmes”, “The Gentlemen”, and “Wrath of Man”. It is based on the 2014 book Churchill’s Secret Warriors: The Explosive True Story of the Special Forces Desperadoes of WWII by Damien Lewis. The Black Ops have been known for their secrecy and performance under our radar. However, its unattributed association with any organization gives this covert operation the advantage of deceiving its enemies. But how did this secretive operation come to be, you may ask? Well, it all started back in the 1940s, when a British organization performed a seemingly impossible task to sabotage the dreadful Nazis. This crucial part of Britain’s war against Nazi Germany gave birth to modern-day black operations and irregular warfare, and now it’s been turned into an action comedy led by Guy Ritchie and Superman himself, Henry Cavill. This film seeks to attract more audiences seeking R-rated fun outside the horror genre, especially those familiar with Ritchie’s stylized and fast-paced presentation. Does it deliver another offbeat shoot-em-up worthy of the big-screen treatment? Let’s find out. The story is a heavily fictionalized depiction of Operation Postmaster, a British special operation during the Second World War. It was conducted by the Special Operations Executive, a covert organization formed by Prime Minister Winston Churchill to perform espionage and sabotage in Nazi-occupied Europe. To combat the Nazis, the SOE conjured up a solution to gain the upper hand: hiring a group of highly-skilled soldiers outside its premises, including Gus March-Phillipps (Cavill). Known as the Small Scale Raiding Force, Gus and his team, including Marjorie Stewart (Gonzalez) and Anders Lassen (Ritchson), are tasked to invade enemy territory and sabotage the Nazis’ plot for world domination. Unsurprisingly, any movie directed by Ritchie will always spark my interest, with this film being one of them. Some of his recent movies didn’t impress me as much as everyone else regarding their executions. However, a few of his films have made me admire his unique presentation and British humor, including “The Gentlemen” and “The Covenant”, which I thought was one of his best in recent memory. “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare” looks to be another Ritchie movie seeking to deliver the fun and high-octane energy from its action and comedy aspects as shown in the marketing. In short, it’d be more like “The Gentlemen” than “Wrath of Man” and “The Covenant”. After watching the film early, thanks to its advanced screening, I’m pleased to say I was right. It’s no crowned jewel of war movies or even spy films in general, but the film proves that Guy Ritchie hasn’t lost his touch regarding his approach to popcorn entertainment. If you’re going into “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare” expecting it to be a groundbreaking and serious fact-based action drama, you’ll quickly be disappointed with the result. Besides, Ritchie already made a dramatic action movie last year, so I don’t think he needs to take that approach twice in a row. Instead, the film is a straightforward, action-packed shoot-em-up that also functions as a race-against-the-clock boat trip to Nazi territory. Of course, since this is a Guy Ritchie movie, it’s not without a few instances of charisma-driven British humor to liven up its tone amid its adult-rated violence. If you come to this film for that, I will gladly say that “Ungentlemanly Warfare” will satisfy your needs. While specific plot and character moments felt lost underneath its colorful carnage, it easily compensates for it by delivering a healthy dose of entertainment and energy in its storytelling, direction, and cast. I know I've been saying this a lot, but Guy Ritchie is a solid filmmaker with an innate understanding of making fun, stylish movies. His style, writing skills, and tone perfectly align with his vision, providing a unique and captivating flavor to the action and spy genres. Despite the occasional hit-or-miss narratives, Ritchie's films are irresistibly charming and vibrant, making for exciting and engaging cinematic experiences. “Ungentlemanly Warfare” is no exception, with Ritchie incorporating his usual fast-cutting technique and energetic presentation into its 1940s production design and action sequences. As a result, it delivered some brutal yet satisfying instances of violence and a suitably paced spy adventure where each character plays a role in carrying its weight. This includes the humor and the chemistry between the cast, both of which successfully shoot down its naysayers, like how Henry Cavill shoots down the Nazis, with the comedy providing some delightful laughs through its dialogue. Henry Cavill has been working nonstop to make himself known outside the DC universe, and I don’t blame him. Some of his non-Superman roles were decent at best, including Agent Argylle in the recently released “Argylle”, but sadly, he has yet to truly shine regarding his box office returns outside the DC Cinematic Universe. Based on what I saw from “Ungentlemanly Warfare”, I really hope his role will break that losing streak. Cavill’s take on Gus March-Phillipps was a joy to witness on screen, not just because of his distinctive performance. It’s also due to Cavill’s charm and radiant appeal that made Gus a stimulating protagonist who shoots first and obeys orders never. He may be serviceable as a dramatic Superman, but when it comes to his light-hearted and comical roles like Gus, Henry Cavill is a real-life superhero we didn’t know we needed. Alan Ritchson also continues to deliver the goods in the action department regarding his role as Anders Lassen. His scenes involving his bow and arrow were surprisingly impressive. It’s as if Robin Hood was a sniper in World War II instead of leading his band of Merry Men in Sherwood Forest. Eiza González was also decent as Marjorie Stewart, an SOE agent sent undercover in a Nazi-occupied area. Even though Marjorie’s scenes without Gus’s gang were a bit concerning at first regarding the pacing, González managed to surprise me with her attempt to drive these scenes through her performance and her character’s significance to the mission. Overall, “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare” doesn’t provide many gentlemanly affairs, and it’s all the better because of it. It may not break any barriers in the action and spy genres regarding its simplistic narrative and straightforward characters. However, when it comes to Guy Ritchie himself, it hardly needs to. This is another stylish and entertaining action comedy that benefitted from Ritchie’s energetic vision and colorful cast of characters, which is enough to satisfy the director’s fans and the Nazi haters. With its charismatic cast, dynamic presentation, and action sequences exciting enough to carry a flawed yet serviceable story, the movie is a war-infested blast from start to finish. B- |
Home of the most friendly movie reviews on the planet.
Categories
All
Follow Me |